Re: [Rd] XFIG color output (PR#7491)

From: Prof Brian Ripley <ripley_at_stats.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue 11 Jan 2005 - 05:45:13 EST

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 chris.haidinyak@amd.com wrote:

> Full_Name: Chris Haidinyak
> Version: 2.0.1 & 1.9.0
> OS: Linux x86_64
> Submission from: (NULL) (139.95.251.9)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using R 1.9.0 (on Linux Redhat AS 3 - x86_64) and 2.0.1 (on Linux Fedora
> Core 3 - x86_64) and am having problems using graphs created with the xfig
> option.
>
>
> 1.9.0 problem - sometimes the graph output puts the color definitions in the
> wrong place in the file. According to the xfig program, color definitions must
> come before any object. For whatever reason, R sometimes produces xfig files
> with color definitions in the wrong place. Run demo('graphics') to recreate the
> problem.

I can't. What exactly are you doing, and in which file does this occur? I have just tested all of them.

If perchance you were using onefile=TRUE, do read the comment in the help file.

Please produce a reproducible example.

> 2.0.1 problem - This release seems worse that 1.9.0. All of the graphic output
> from R to xfig (using the following script
> xfig()
> demo('graphics')
> dev.off()
> produces only b/w graphs or no graph at all.

Paul Murrell altered the alpha channel handling in 2.0.0, and missed this one. I have a patch tested and about to go into 2.0.1-patched.

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595

______________________________________________
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Received on Tue Jan 11 04:51:25 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue 11 Jan 2005 - 05:20:40 EST