Re: [Rd] typo in ?lowess

From: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch_at_stats.uwo.ca>
Date: Sat 11 Jun 2005 - 13:07:10 GMT

Tobias Verbeke wrote:
> In the `See Also' section of ?lowess, I read
>
> 'loess'), a newer formula based version [...]

Fixed, thanks.

Duncan Murdoch



R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Sat Jun 11 23:19:55 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 24 Oct 2005 - 22:27:17 GMT