Re: [Rd] R 2.1.1 slated for June 20

From: Marc Schwartz <MSchwartz_at_mn.rr.com>
Date: Wed 15 Jun 2005 - 12:49:38 GMT

On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 07:51 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> Our preference is F77 compilers over F9x ones, as the lists Simon showed
> reflects - we decided to prefer F95 to F90 in future, though.
>
> My experience is that g77 from gcc-3.4.x is preferable to gfortran.
> As I said earlier, once gcc-4.0.1 is released (and so R builds with a
> released version of gcc-4.x.y - 4.0.0 needs worarounds) I will take a
> another look. So far, using gcc-3.4.4 is both faster and more accurate
> that gcc-4.0.0. There are a few instances in which loess gives rather
> different results with gfortran, but they are only visible by diffing
> postscript files.
>
> I will look into converting blas.f to F77 (but not for this release).

<snip>

I have re-installed g77 and re-compiled from scratch with it.

Unless the FC folks have backported gcc-3.4 updates to gcc-3.2, that update appears to not be imminent, as the FC devel tree (rawhide) is still at gcc-3.2.

Best regards,

Marc



R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Wed Jun 15 22:51:56 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 24 Oct 2005 - 22:27:19 GMT