Re: [Rd] R 2.1.1 slated for June 20

From: Marc Schwartz <MSchwartz_at_mn.rr.com>
Date: Thu 16 Jun 2005 - 15:00:17 GMT

On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 15:23 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
> >> From what I can tell, there is only one reason that the FC-E R RPM is
> > available as a shared library:
> >
> > Tom had made the gnomeGUI CRAN package available as an RPM in FC-E,
> > which of course requires the above:
> >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/extras/4/i386/repodata/repoview/R-gnomeGUI-0-2.1.0-4.html
> >
> > I would defer to the opinion of others here, but given the rather
> > limited functionality of the R GNOME GUI and that not much if any work
> > is presently being done on it (is that correct?), does Tom's approach
> > really make sense?
>
> No work is being done on it. It remains only as an example of a console
> front-end.
>
> Brian

That being the confirmed case, it seems reasonable to facilitate Tom's making an informed decision as to the pros and cons of his approach and that his choice is askew from a "default" R configuration.

Needless to say, his choice, presumably based upon the inclusion of the gnomeGUI package, is to an extent exclusionary to KDE and other DE users who will (unknowingly) pay a defacto performance price if installing R via FC-E.

Marc



R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Fri Jun 17 01:32:46 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 24 Oct 2005 - 22:27:20 GMT