[Rd] Patches (was Re: documentation for eval() typo)

From: Paul Roebuck <roebuck_at_odin.mdacc.tmc.edu>
Date: Mon 15 Aug 2005 - 15:10:04 GMT

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:

> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Paul Roebuck wrote:
>
> >> It is equivalent to 'evalq' except the its default
>
> It would be easier to deal with thes reports if in future you
> could provide a patch against the source file (here eval.Rd).

I normally download a copy of the current binary and the matching source distribution for performing searches, so would not be tracking r-devel or r-patched updates.

Would the following have been palatable as annotated?

R-2.1.1/src/library/base/man/eval.Rd:
59c59
< equivalent to \code{evalq} except that its default argument creates a

---

> equivalent to \code{evalq} except the its default argument creates a
---------------------------------------------------------- SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped) ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Received on Tue Aug 16 01:20:26 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 20 Feb 2006 - 03:21:16 GMT