Re: [Rd] Building R with f2c - still needed?

From: Prof Brian Ripley <ripley_at_stats.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu 15 Dec 2005 - 08:09:49 GMT

Thank you both for the comments. The problem is that we have a lot of special-casing for f2c in the configure code, and I think it is becoming unmaintainable. (I've been doing some cleaning up after discovering several errors in little-used cases, e.g. a substitute for alloca was compiled iff --enable-R-shlib was not specified.)

A cleaner solution would be to use a wrapper for f2c as a pseudo-compiler. I'll test that, and if it works then start to strip the special-casing out.

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 09:48:56PM +0000, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>> Does anyone have a need to use f2c rather than a Fortran compiler to build
>> R?
>
> We used f2c up until a few months ago as a last line of defence against
> crappy Fg77 code on m68k/arm (one or both, it changed at times).
>
> I'd be hesitant about throwing it out, but it is of course your call.
>
> Thanks, Dirk
>
> --
> Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.
> -- Thomas A. Edison
>
>

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Received on Thu Dec 15 19:19:48 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu 15 Dec 2005 - 21:21:58 GMT