Re: [Rd] chron vs. POSIX

From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd_at_debian.org>
Date: Fri 14 Jul 2006 - 21:19:08 GMT

On 14 July 2006 at 16:32, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
| On 7/14/06, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> wrote:
| > Date and POSIXt have served me well over the last few years. They are
| > maintained and being extended [ 1 ]. Chron, to the best of my knowledge, is
| > dead code so I'd bet against it appearing in core R any time soon.

[...]  

| Recent releases of chron include
|
| - July 14th (today!), see
| http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/chron.html
|
| - June 23rd (less than one month ago),
|
| - May 9th (two months ago)
|
| (this may not be a complete list of recent releases) so I would characterize
| chron as actively maintained and given the occasional question on r-help
| its likely that its widely used too.

Shows you what 'the best of my knowledge' is worth :) I must have confused it with the date package where the sole change in the last 2+ years was the addition of a file inst/CITATION. Sorry for spreading misinformation.

Dirk

-- 
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. 
                                                  -- Thomas A. Edison

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Received on Sat Jul 15 07:30:16 2006

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Fri 14 Jul 2006 - 22:25:33 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.