G'day Matt
On Fri, 30 May 2008 10:30:22 +1000 (EST) <mwand_at_uow.edu.au> wrote:
> But the main reason is that I thought
> this was the only version of Fortran
> that could be integrated into R.
> This come out of discussions I had
> with Robert (with an "R") Gentleman
> only about 2 years ago; e.g.
> Fortran 90 code is no good re R.
People interested in Fortran 90/95 in connection with R might be interested in the following two threads on r-devel:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2007-December/047694.html https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2007-December/047799.html
In particular the comment by Brian Ripley in one of the threads:
However, I would not let that deter you: just use .f95 extensions on the Fortran 95 files and avoid underlines. For Windows users you are effectively requiring R >= 2.6.0.
Cheers,
Berwin
-- R-downunder_at_stat.auckland.ac.nz http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/r-downunder To unsubscribe send an email to R-downunder-unsubscribe_at_stat.auckland.ac.nzReceived on Fri 30 May 2008 - 17:40:15 EST
Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by
the discipline of
statistics at the
University of Newcastle,
Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Wed 04 Jun 2008 - 14:30:04 EST.