Re: [Rd] Package development process?

From: Patrick Burns <pburns_at_pburns.seanet.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:22:57 +0100

I agree with Hadley, and add that trying to have an example be both an example and a test may not be good for the example
aspect either.

Examples should make people who are ignorant of the function twig as to how the function works. Creating good examples is hard.

Problems that really test the software are unlikely to serve as a good example. Good examples are unlikely to seriously test the code. (But you do want the examples to run, it is seriously bad advertising when they don't.)

Pat

On 16/06/2010 15:53, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>> What about the encouragement to add unit tests, if only disguised as
>> examples?
>
> Examples are not unit tests. Examples are a convenient way of testing
> some aspects of the package, but serve a rather different purpose to
> tests. The R community does not emphase testing nearly as much as
> other communities. For example, Ruby has a very strong testing
> culture including at least 10 different unit testing frameworks.
>
>> I've found the unit tests to be a powerful tool to help improve and
>> maintain the quality of packages to which I contribute. To this end, Sundar
>> and I added a column "Autochecks" to the table of "Selected Repositories" in
>> the Wikipedia article on "Software repository"
>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_repository), and we describe it
>> briefly in the text introducing that table.
>
> Unfortunately your description highlights a inadequacy of R and poor
> software development procedures on the part of many R package
> developers (including me!). For exactly the reason you discuss, it's
> never a good idea for your package to depend on the most current
> version of another package. If you do, changes to that package might
> break yours. Most other package management systems allow you to
> specify the version of a dependency so that this doesn't happen. You
> can do this with R, but because it's hard to have multiple versions of
> the same package installed at the same time, it's not as useful.
>
> Hadley
>

-- 
Patrick Burns
pburns_at_pburns.seanet.com
http://www.burns-stat.com
(home of 'Some hints for the R beginner'
and 'The R Inferno')

______________________________________________
R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Received on Thu 17 Jun 2010 - 09:24:58 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Thu 17 Jun 2010 - 12:01:06 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive