Re: [Rd] BLAS benchmarks on R 2.12.0

From: Michael Spiegel <michael.m.spiegel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:43:19 -0400

Hi Andrew,

In the majority of use cases of our package, we end up doing lots and lots of matrix operations on small matrices, as opposed to matrix operations on large matrices. The optimized BLAS libraries are usually optimized for large matrices. The reference implementation is faster than either veclib, Atlas, or the Goto BLAS implementations, I've tested all of them on our performance test suite.

--Michael

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Andrew Piskorski <atp_at_piskorski.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:41:24PM -0400, Michael Spiegel wrote:
>
>> 1) Compile the reference BLAS implementation with unsafe optimizations
>> and include it as a part of the OpenMx library.
>
> If BLAS speed is important to you, why are you even trying to use the
> slow reference BLAS library at all, rather than one of the faster
> optimized BLAS libraries (Atlas, Goto, AMD, Intel, etc.)?
>
> --
> Andrew Piskorski <atp_at_piskorski.com>
> http://www.piskorski.com/
>



R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Mon 01 Nov 2010 - 23:50:08 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Tue 02 Nov 2010 - 07:50:15 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive