[Rd] S4 generic functions/methods vs enclosures

From: A Zege <andre.zege_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 07:54:45 -0700 (PDT)


Apologies for asking something that is probably very obvious, i just started with S4 classes and i guess i am not finding documentation that lays out the grammar rules and gives enough examples.

I understand that main method of writing a member function is to write a generic function and setMethod for this particular class. This, however, presumes that there is "virtuality" for this function, i.e. it could be used with other inherited classes . Truth is, many, if not most of my functions don't have virtuality in mind. I want to write them inside classes to achieve incapsulaton only -- use class member data without passing it as parameters or making global to a bunch of functions and have some specific class member functions that don't pollute a global namespace and can be called only for a particular class. This is what enclosured do in R. Is there some obvious way of setting this environment local to a class and without writing generic functions that i am missing?

Would appreciate any pointers

--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/S4-generic-functions-methods-vs-enclosures-tp3430950p3430950.html
Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

______________________________________________
R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Received on Wed 06 Apr 2011 - 14:59:09 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Wed 06 Apr 2011 - 23:30:46 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive