Re: [Rd] Wish there were a "strict mode" for R interpreter. What about You?

From: Spencer Graves <spencer.graves_at_prodsyse.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 16:02:42 -0700

On 4/9/2011 2:31 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Paul Johnson<pauljohn32@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Years ago, I did lots of Perl programming. Perl will let you be lazy
>> and write functions that refer to undefined variables (like R does),
>> but there is also a strict mode so the interpreter will block anything
>> when a variable is mentioned that has not been defined. I wish there
>> were a strict mode for checking R functions.
>>
>> Here's why. We have a lot of students writing R functions around here
>> and they run into trouble because they use the same name for things
>> inside and outside of functions. When they call functions that have
>> mistaken or undefined references to names that they use elsewhere,
>> then variables that are in the environment are accidentally used. Know
>> what I mean?
>>
>> dat<- whatever
>>
>> someNewFunction<- function(z, w){
>> #do something with z and w and create a new "dat"
>> # but forget to name it "dat"
>> lm (y, x, data=dat)
>> # lm just used wrong data
>> }
>>
>> I wish R had a strict mode to return an error in that case. Users
>> don't realize they are getting nonsense because R finds things to fill
>> in for their mistakes.
>>
>> Is this possible? Does anybody agree it would be good?

>
>> library(codetools)
>> checkUsage(someNewFunction)

> <anonymous>: no visible binding for global variable ‘y’
> <anonymous>: no visible binding for global variable ‘x’
> <anonymous>: no visible binding for global variable ‘dat’
>
> Which also picks up another bug in your function ;)

       Is this run by "R CMD check"? I've seen this message.

       "R CMD check" will give this message sometimes when I don't feel it's appropriate. For example, I define a data object ETB in a package, then give that as the default in a function call like f(data.=ETB){if(missing(data.))data(ETB); data.}. When I run "R CMD check", I get "no visible binding for global variable 'ETB'", even though the function is tested and works during R CMD check.

       Spencer

> Hadley
>

-- 
Spencer Graves, PE, PhD
President and Chief Operating Officer
Structure Inspection and Monitoring, Inc.
751 Emerson Ct.
San José, CA 95126
ph:  408-655-4567

______________________________________________
R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Received on Sat 09 Apr 2011 - 23:07:17 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Sun 10 Apr 2011 - 01:30:44 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive