Re: [Rd] Wish there were a "strict mode" for R interpreter. What about You?

From: Spencer Graves <spencer.graves_at_prodsyse.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 18:21:32 -0700

On 4/9/2011 6:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:

> On 11-04-09 7:02 PM, Spencer Graves wrote:
>> On 4/9/2011 2:31 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Paul Johnson<pauljohn32_at_gmail.com>   
>>> wrote:

>>>> Years ago, I did lots of Perl programming. Perl will let you be lazy
>>>> and write functions that refer to undefined variables (like R does),
>>>> but there is also a strict mode so the interpreter will block anything
>>>> when a variable is mentioned that has not been defined. I wish there
>>>> were a strict mode for checking R functions.
>>>>
>>>> Here's why. We have a lot of students writing R functions around here
>>>> and they run into trouble because they use the same name for things
>>>> inside and outside of functions. When they call functions that have
>>>> mistaken or undefined references to names that they use elsewhere,
>>>> then variables that are in the environment are accidentally used. Know
>>>> what I mean?
>>>>
>>>> dat<- whatever
>>>>
>>>> someNewFunction<- function(z, w){
>>>> #do something with z and w and create a new "dat"
>>>> # but forget to name it "dat"
>>>> lm (y, x, data=dat)
>>>> # lm just used wrong data
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> I wish R had a strict mode to return an error in that case. Users
>>>> don't realize they are getting nonsense because R finds things to fill
>>>> in for their mistakes.

>>>>
>>>> Is this possible? Does anybody agree it would be good?
>>>

>>>> library(codetools)
>>>> checkUsage(someNewFunction)
>>> <anonymous>: no visible binding for global variable ‘y’
>>> <anonymous>: no visible binding for global variable ‘x’
>>> <anonymous>: no visible binding for global variable ‘dat’
>>>
>>> Which also picks up another bug in your function ;)
>>
>>         Is this run by "R CMD check"?  I've seen this message.
>>
>>
>>         "R CMD check" will give this message sometimes when I don't feel
>> it's appropriate.  For example, I define a data object ETB in a package,
>> then give that as the default in a function call like
>> f(data.=ETB){if(missing(data.))data(ETB);  data.}.  When I run "R CMD
>> check", I get "no visible binding for global variable 'ETB'", even
>> though the function is tested and works during R CMD check.
>
> What is ETB?  Your code is looking for a global variable by that name, 
> and that's what codetools is telling you.

Duncan: Thanks for the question.

ETB is a data object in my package. codetools can't find it because data(ETB) is needed before ETB becomes available. codetools is not smart enough to check to see if ETB is a data object in the package.

Spencer

>
> Duncan Murdoch

-- 
Spencer Graves, PE, PhD
President and Chief Operating Officer
Structure Inspection and Monitoring, Inc.
751 Emerson Ct.
San José, CA 95126
ph:  408-655-4567

______________________________________________
R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Received on Sun 10 Apr 2011 - 01:24:31 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Sun 10 Apr 2011 - 01:50:45 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive