Re: [Rd] seq_along and rep_along

From: robin hankin <hankin.robin_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:58:55 +1300

hello folks

[snip]

> but it is frustrating when base
> functionality only works with vectors, not matrices, or arrays. It
> would be more compelling if (e.g.) t and rev also had dimension
> arguments.
>
> Hadley
>
> --

well put! I would add, though, that t() generalizes to aperm(), and the magic package contains arev() which is a generalization of rev().

I'm always on the lookout for other array functionality of this type that might sit well with magic. Anyone?

best wishes

Robin

> Assistant Professor / Dobelman Family Junior Chair
> Department of Statistics / Rice University
> http://had.co.nz/
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

-- 
Robin Hankin
Uncertainty Analyst
hankin.robin_at_gmail.com

______________________________________________
R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Received on Sun 08 Jan 2012 - 20:01:38 GMT

This quarter's messages: by month, or sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

All messages

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Mon 09 Jan 2012 - 02:00:07 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive