Re: [Rd] Updated Windows toolchain

From: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:17:41 -0500

On 12-01-17 7:09 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
> <ripley_at_stats.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>> CRAN Windows binary packages built for R-devel are now online, and Uwe's
>> winbuilder has gained the ability to check source packages under R-devel.
>>
>> Windows check results are available from
>> http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/checkSummaryWin.html
>> and in due course from the main CRAN check page.
>>
>> There have been a few updates to the toolchain:
>>
>> (i) It is now based on a beta of gcc 4.6.3, and so reports almost the same
>> compilation warnings/errors as the CRAN check machines.
>>
>
> Is the binary R-devel provided by CRAN built against this toolchain?
> If it is, should I expect "R --arch x64 CMD config CC" to report
> "gcc"? It still reports "x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc" (R-devel 58077).
>
> Also, I have the latest Rtools installed (VERSION.txt reads "Rtools
> version 2.15.0.1911") and it is first on my PATH.

This is a temporary problem: you want a different path for R-devel builds (one that puts the new compiler first) than for R 2.14.x builds.

I think Rtools should default to offering the path for 2.14.x, but perhaps it should offer the newer one as well.

What I do is have a bash alias that resets the path when I choose to work in a particular version, but Rtools doesn't include anything like this.

Duncan Murdoch

>
> I expect "gcc --version" to report 4.6.3 but it still says 4.5.0.
>
> "x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc --version" reports 4.5.2.
> "which gcc" reports "/cygdrive/c/Rtools215/MinGW/bin/gcc".
>
> "which x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc" reports
> "/cygdrive/c/Rtools215/MinGW64/bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc".
>
>> (ii) There are various bug-fixes to the toolchain: notably x^n and exp(x)
>> use gradual underflow to denormal numbers rather than abrubtly underflowing
>> to zero.
>>
>> (iii) This is a 'multilib' toolchain: the compiler is named 'gcc.exe' for
>> both architectures, selected by flag -m32 (the default) and -m64.
>
> Looks like to check gcc versions I should (instead of what I do above)
> do simply "gcc --version". I imagine that "gcc -m32 --version" would
> report the same thing as "gcc -m64 --version".
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
>
>>
>>
>> On 29/11/2011 07:56, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>>
>>> An updated toolchain is now being used for Windows' builds of R-devel:
>>> details are in the R-admin manual and at
>>>
http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/ and
>>> http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/Rtools/
>>>
>>> Both 32- and 64-bit parts of the toolchain use v2.0.1 of the Mingw-w64
>>> project's runtime and a beta of gcc 4.5.4: the Mingw.org project's
>>> builds are no longer used. This should mean that code which compiles for
>>> 64-bit Windows also compiles for 32-bit Windows, and v.v. unless code
>>> makes (incorrect but common) assumptions that pointers fit into longs.
>>>
>>> A very few packages will need modifications because they contain
>>> declarations which clash with the headers in this toolchain: where we
>>> are aware of problems the maintainers have been informed.
>>>
>>> At DLL level different Windows' toolchains should be compatible: at C
>>> level they mostly are but at C++ level they are pretty much incompatible
>>> (so that for example GDAL has to be re-compiled for every toolchain: and
>>> Rcpp users need to be careful to use only one toolchain for Rcpp and
>>> their packages). All the external software previously made available
>>> (and more) is made available at http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/Rtools .
>>>
>>> The toolchain has support for OpenMP and pthreads: however OpenMP
>>> support is not enabled by default in R (it is too slow to be much use).
>>> If you do make use of it in your packages, be aware that you will need
>>> to ship the appropriate pthreads DLL(s).
>>>
>>> It is expected that there will be several further minor updates prior to
>>> the release of 2.15.0 in ca 4 months, but this step is the major one.
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Brian D. Ripley, ripley_at_stats.ox.ac.uk
>> Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
>> University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
>> 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
>> Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Wed 18 Jan 2012 - 13:20:14 GMT

This quarter's messages: by month, or sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

All messages

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Wed 18 Jan 2012 - 23:10:10 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive