Re: [Rd] Non-default build options

From: Sharpie <chuck_at_sharpsteen.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:07:30 -0800 (PST)

Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote
>
> b) having BLAS as a defined interface is wonderful for swapping default
> (unaccelerated) BLAS for accelerated BLAS like Atlas, Goto,
> OpenBLAS,
> MKL, ... Several of these BLAS have in fact been available for
> either
> Debian or Ubuntu in some form (sometimes involving a helper script
> as
> eg Goto could never be part of an FLOSS distro).
>

Just an aside: Goto BLAS is now available under the BSD license, so it should be perfectly acceptable to include in a FLOSS distribution. However, development has ceased so Goto will probably loose it's edge as new CPU families are shipped.

-Charlie



Charlie Sharpsteen
Undergraduate-- Environmental Resources Engineering Humboldt State University
--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Non-default-build-options-tp4328512p4329615.html
Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

______________________________________________
R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Received on Thu 26 Jan 2012 - 06:10:10 GMT

This quarter's messages: by month, or sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

All messages

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Thu 26 Jan 2012 - 20:30:12 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive