Re: [Rd] good practice for values not provided

From: Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendieck_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun 19 Nov 2006 - 20:57:53 GMT

One possibility is:

f <- function(a, b, x) if (missing(x)) a+b else a-b-x

although that does have the disadvantage that one cannot explicitly tell it not to use x but rather its denoted by its absence.

On 11/19/06, Tamas K Papp <tpapp@princeton.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing a collection of functions which I plan to share as a
> package later (when they are tested thoroughly), so I would like to do
> things "right" from the beginning...
>
> I encountered a minor question of style. Consider a function
>
> f <- function(a,b,x=NULL) {
> ## ...
> }
>
> if !is.null(x), f will use x to calculate the result, but if
> is.null(x), it will do something else not involving x at all (using
> any x would be meaningless here, so I can't use
> x=calcsomethingfrom(a,b)).
>
> What's the accepted way of indicating this in R with a default for x?
> x=FALSE? x=NA? x=NULL?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tamas
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>



R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Mon Nov 20 16:35:57 2006

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Mon 20 Nov 2006 - 14:00:42 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.