[Rd] order of levels in interaction()

From: Deepayan Sarkar <deepayan.sarkar_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu 30 Nov 2006 - 21:25:36 GMT


Hi,

?interaction says:

See Also:

     'factor'; ':' where 'f:g' is the similar to 'interaction(f, g,
     sep=":")' when 'f' and  'g' are factors.

This is not quite true (or maybe 'similar' is the operative word), since:

> f <- factor(1:3); g <- factor(letters[1:3])
> levels(f:g)

[1] "1:a" "1:b" "1:c" "2:a" "2:b" "2:c" "3:a" "3:b" "3:c"
> levels(interaction(f, g, sep = ":"))

[1] "1:a" "2:a" "3:a" "1:b" "2:b" "3:b" "1:c" "2:c" "3:c"

Note the different order of the levels. I like the order in f:g better (and at least one other person agrees [1] ), but I also want the flexibility of having a 'sep' argument. Would it be possible to change interaction to allow this? A simple fix that makes interaction behave like ":" is to replace

as.vector(outer(l, lvs, paste, sep = sep))

with

as.vector(t(outer(l, lvs, paste, sep = sep)))

in interaction.

-Deepayan

[1] http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/help/06/08/32638.html



R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Fri Dec 01 08:32:45 2006

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Fri 01 Dec 2006 - 09:30:53 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.