On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 11:19 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> You will see the current code is different, and your 'fix' is not needed=20
> nor applies in R-devel.
would be nice...
> You failed to provide an example to reproduce the alleged bug, but the=20
well the bug was obvious, I told that I can trigger it and that the proposed fix fixed it - no need to provide an example.
> issue does seem to be using lines beyond the documented line length.
exactly. one can crash R with too long lines.
> So it would have only affected people who did that ....
or use auto-generated code like e.g. swig produces.
> And generating a new report (PR#11438) was distinctly unfriendly.
I did what I was told, reply and keep the PR#11281 in the subject. I am sensing another bug.
> If after studing the R FAQ you have a reproducible example in a
> current=20
> version of R (R-devel or R-patched), plus add it to *this* report
> number.
I don't intend to play with devel versions of R, I was just trying to
get swig for R2.7 to work. Sorry that it triggered a bug in R. =EF=BB=BFI w=
ill
try R2.7.1 when it is released and report back.
Soeren.
Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by
the discipline of
statistics at the
University of Newcastle,
Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Tue 13 May 2008 - 09:31:31 GMT.
Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.