On 5/10/2008 5:20 PM, bugreports_at_nn7.de wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 11:19 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>> You will see the current code is different, and your 'fix' is not needed=20 >> nor applies in R-devel.
>> You failed to provide an example to reproduce the alleged bug, but the=20
But it would be helpful to provide an example, so that we can test the fix. As Brian told you, your fix was no good: it was not against the current code.
>
>> issue does seem to be using lines beyond the documented line length.
Then the bug is also in your code, for sending lines that are too long.
R shouldn't crash on user error, but "don't do that" is an appropriate
response.
>
>> So it would have only affected people who did that ....
Then swig should be modified to produce valid code.
>
>> And generating a new report (PR#11438) was distinctly unfriendly.
>> If after studing the R FAQ you have a reproducible example in a >> current=20 >> version of R (R-devel or R-patched), plus add it to *this* report >> number.
If you aren't interested in being helpful by testing fixes for your code, then I doubt if any of us are going to go out of our way to help you with your errors.
Duncan Murdoch
>
> Soeren.
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by
the discipline of
statistics at the
University of Newcastle,
Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Tue 13 May 2008 - 07:31:36 GMT.
Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.