Re: [Rd] axis() ignores supplied value of argument mgp[3]?

From: J. R. M. Hosking <jh910_at_juno.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:26:59 -0400

Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, J. R. M. Hosking wrote:
>

>> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>> What is true is that the line is set before the inline setting of mgp 
>>> is processed: it all depends on what 'supplied' means, and you 
>>> supplied two values.
>>>
>>> This is changed in R-patched now.
>>
>> Thank you, that works.  Here is a perhaps related issue:
>>
>> R Help on 'axis' for argument 'line' says "The relative placing of
>> tick marks and tick labels is unchanged".  But this appears not to be
>> the case when graphics parameter mgp[3] is nonzero:
>>
>>  plot(1:4, yaxt="n")
>>  par(mgp=c(3,2,1))
>>  axis(2, 1:2)
>>  axis(2, 3:4, line=1)
>>
>> which one (or, at least, I) would expect to place all the tick labels
>> the same distance into the margin, does not in fact do so.

>
> I don't think that is what it says. Setting 'line' or 'pos' temporarily
> sets mgp[3] to zero (which is what the help implies in parts you did not
> quote).

I'm afraid I read the help closely several times and did not find that implication.

> Otherwise 'line' would just duplicate mgp[3].

Which is still useful functionality --- easier to supply a single value than to change one element of a 3-element vector.

>> My interpretation is that axis() is taking mgp[2] rather than the
>> correct mgp[2]-mgp[3] as the relative position of the tick mark with

>
> Why is it correct when you have been told 'mgp[3]' was overridden?

That was my best attempt to interpret the phrase "relative placing of ... tick labels", given that no graphics parameter is explicitly documented as having that meaning.

> We could explicitly say it is treated as zero for ultimate clarity.
>
>> respect to the axis line.

To summarize (if I now understand things correctly): when the position of the axis line is determined by the value of mgp[3], then mgp[2] is the absolute position (number of lines into the margin) of the tick labels; but if the position of the axis line is determined by the 'line' or 'pos' arguments of axis(), then mgp[2] is the relative position of the tick labels (number of lines between the tick labels and the axis line). If this is the intended behaviour, then certainly I think it would be helpful if it were explicitly documented.

J. R. M. Hosking



R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Thu 07 Aug 2008 - 00:34:49 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Thu 07 Aug 2008 - 06:36:38 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive