Hello, I have come across a result that I cannot explain, and am hoping that
someone else can provide an answer. A student fitted a mixed model using
the lme function: out<- lme(fixed=Y~A+B+A:B, random=~1|Site). Y is a
continuous variable while A and B are factors. The data set is balanced
with the same number of observations in each combination of A and B. There
are two hierarchical levels: Site and plots nested in site.
He tried two different ways of getting theANOVA table: anova(out) and anova(out, type=”marginal”).
Since the data were balanced, these two ways should (I think) give the same output since they correspond to Type I and III sums of squares in the SAS terminology. At least, this is the case with normal (i.e. not mixed) linear models. However, he finds very different results of these two types of ANOVA tables. Why?
Bill Shipley
North American Editor, Annals of Botany
Département de biologie
Université de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke (Québec) J1K 2R1
Canada
(819) 821-8049 FAX
<http://pages.usherbrooke.ca/jshipley/recherche/>
http://pages.usherbrooke.ca/jshipley/recherche/
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by
the discipline of
statistics at the
University of Newcastle,
Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Tue 06 May 2008 - 22:30:35 GMT.
Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.