[Rd] Variable/function namespaces WAS: Bug in subsetting data frame (PR#13515)

From: Stavros Macrakis <macrakis_at_alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:07:36 -0500


On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch_at_stats.uwo.ca> wrote:
> Stavros Macrakis wrote:

>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch_at_stats.uwo.ca>wrote:
>>> The evaluator recognizes the context of usage and will get the
>>> function for a function call....
>> Can you point me to chapter and verse in the language definition...

> No, I'm also unable to find it.

! This seems like a pretty fundamental thing to leave undocumented....

> ...I think originally there was no difference, and it caused the obvious trouble when people used variable names like t and c other short function names, so this was added. I don't remember whether the different lookup rules showed up first in R or S.

There is an interesting discussion of these issues (in a Lisp context) in "Technical Issues of Separation in Function Cells and Value Cells" Lisp and Symbolic Computation 1:1:81 (6/1988) -- available at http://www.nhplace.com/kent/Papers/Technical-Issues.html. I don't think an R-style approach is discussed there, though.

                -s

______________________________________________
R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Tue 10 Feb 2009 - 16:09:34 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Tue 10 Feb 2009 - 23:30:24 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive