Re: [Rd] [R] Semantics of sequences in R

From: Wacek Kusnierczyk <Waclaw.Marcin.Kusnierczyk_at_idi.ntnu.no>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:27:08 +0100

Berwin A Turlach wrote:
>
> I am well aware of those fortunes and maybe you missed the one:
>
>
>> fortune("Watson")
>>
>
> Getting flamed for asking dumb questions on a public mailing list is
> all part of growing up and being a man/woman.
> -- Michael Watson (in a discussion on whether answers on R-help
> should be more polite)
> R-help (December 2004)
>

i did miss it. i'm gladly including it in my collection of quotes documenting your approach to your users. thanks.

>
>> ah, so what's the difference between the way i pinpoint design flaws
>> and the way r gurus respond to people, so that i am running with a
>> chip on my shoulder, and they are being 'negatively
>> motivating/reinforcing' in didactic terms? [...]
>>
>
> Your goal is, presumably, that you want to have the design flaws
> fixed/discussed/&c. The goal of the R gurus is to avoid having to
> waste their time on unproductive issues because people do not read
> documentation/behave contrary to how they are asked to behave/&c.
>
> To reach your goal, the controversial approach is counter productive.
> To reach their goal, the controversial approach can be quite effective.
>
>

nice summary. you rule, we crawl.

> Come on, read your own quote above: "Shouldn't the tests have captured
> this? I think you should have a check for every feature following from
> the docs", If this is not "telling others that they should write such
> test", then what is?
>

employing the recent trick of duncan's, i'd say that i wasn't telling anyone that they should do something. i said 'i think', which is explaining what i think, not telling to do.

but even without the trick, even if i said 'you should' instead of 'i think you should', if you were not oversensitive, exaggerating, and prejudiced, you would be able to read it as a suggestion. we clearly differ in our understanding of 'tell' -- and it's of course my fault, as my english is certainly more unlike the official than yours.

vQ



R-devel_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Tue 24 Feb 2009 - 09:33:25 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Tue 24 Feb 2009 - 10:30:39 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive