From: Kaspar Pflugshaupt (pflugshaupt@geobot.umnw.ethz.ch)
Date: Mon 05 Mar 2001 - 18:23:15 EST
Message-ID: <B6C90B83.81D0%pflugshaupt@geobot.umnw.ethz.ch>
On 2/27/01 8:00 AM, Graham Smith wrote:
> This is only partly an R question, but this seems a good place to ask.
>
> Like many, if not most, statistics programs, R has no post hoc tests
> for Kruskal Wallis or Friedman, and as far as I can make out they are
> not available in any of the R packages. I would be grateful if someone
> could point me in the right direction if I am wrong.
The math is not as simple as in the parametric case.
I've found some non-parametric post-hoc tests in Zar, Biostatistical
Analysis, 4th ed, Prentice Hall, Chapter 11. (Nemenyi/Dunn test and some
variations thereof, with explanations of advantages/drawbacks). They should
be easy to implement, if you know some R.
Cheers
Kaspar Pflugshaupt
--Kaspar Pflugshaupt Geobotanisches Institut Zuerichbergstr. 38 CH-8044 Zuerich
Tel. ++41 1 632 43 19 Fax ++41 1 632 12 15
mailto:pflugshaupt@geobot.umnw.ethz.ch privat:pflugshaupt@mails.ch http://www.geobot.umnw.ethz.ch
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri 22 Jun 2001 - 18:58:35 EST