From: A.J. Rossini (rossini@blindglobe.net)
Date: Fri 30 Mar 2001 - 02:25:08 EST
Message-ID: <87elvga6fv.fsf@jeeves.blindglobe.net>
>>>>> "db" == david beede <david.beede@mail.doc.gov> writes:
db> Interestingly, the 10 hours of CPU time was split as follows:
db> 6 hours for EMACS.EXE and 4 hours for RTERM.EXE. Does this
db> necessarily mean that if I source()'d my program directly into
db> RTERM that I could save a lot of time? (I just want to note
db> here that I have found the EMACS/ESS combinations *extremely*
db> helpful for developing my code; it would be nice if it were
db> indeed the case that after development one could switch over
db> to solo R to do the big jobs.)
I suspect that just using BATCH (it exists under Windows, right? this
is pure speculation) would be the right thing to do. Not having
Emacs running will save a few Mb, which when you start adding up swap
time, could be worth it.
Of course I agree that development with Emacs/ESS is the way to go,
but for long-term work (i.e. over 5-10 minutes), you might as well do
it externally.
best,
-tony
-- A.J. Rossini Rsrch. Asst. Prof. of Biostatistics UW Biostat/Center for AIDS Research rossini@u.washington.edu FHCRC/SCHARP/HIV Vaccine Trials Net rossini@scharp.org -------- (friday is unknown) -------- FHCRC: M--W : 206-667-7025 (fax=4812)|Voicemail is pretty sketchy CFAR: ?? : 206-731-3647 (fax=3694)|Email is far better than phone UW: Th : 206-543-1044 (fax=3286)|Change last 4 digits of phone to FAX -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri 22 Jun 2001 - 18:58:37 EST