From: Bill Simpson (wsi@gcal.ac.uk)
Date: Mon 23 Jul 2001 - 20:18:40 EST
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10107231025520.865-100000@localhost.localdomain>
>
> The example uses a rather artificial dataset, neatly divided into
> monotonically increasing low and high values. Any permutation of those
> values that did not fall into that pattern would render the question
> meaningless. For example, try
The example I posted was artificial because my real example had 10,000
pts and I didn't want to post that. Basically I wanted to look at the
region surrounding one frequency of the spectrum where I expected a peak.
I couldn't see the peak because plot() had used the whole set of data to
pick the range for the y-axis.
There was of course a nice peak but it was invisible because this peak was
maybe 1/1000 as high as the maximum peak in the whole spectrum.
>
> I think the present behavior of plot() is pretty sensible.
If you look around at other plotting programs out there I think you'll see
some doing what I propose. I think if you use small datasets the current
plot() behaviour will not cause problems. It's only a pain once you start
zooming in on small stretches.
Bill
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed 10 Mar 2004 - 08:18:21 EST