From: Achim Zeileis (zeileis@ci.tuwien.ac.at)
Date: Thu 14 Feb 2002 - 02:51:37 EST
Message-id: <3C6A8B89.A9BB9764@ci.tuwien.ac.at>
Ole Christensen wrote:
>
> Dear R people
>
> The function below should be decreasing, convex, and tend to zero when x
> tends to infinity.
>
> curve((1-pnorm(x))/dnorm(x),from=0, to=9)
>
> >From the plot we see that for x between 8.0 and 8.3 the function is
> fluctuating.
You get a numerically more stable result by using logs:
R> curve(exp(pnorm(x, lower.tail=FALSE, log.p=TRUE)-dnorm(x,
log=TRUE)),from=0, to=9)
> As far as I understand, this is due to the function pnorm() not being
> sufficiently accurate in the tails.
> I am using pnorm() in a way that has probably not been intended.
> So I guess this should not be considered a bug (??)
>
> The function can also be written as 1/lambda(x) where lambda(x) is the
> hazard rate for the normal distribution. Is there a way to calculate
> lambda(x) without using pnorm() ?
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Cheers
>
> Ole Christensen
>
> --
> Ole F. Christensen
> Department of Mathematics and Statistics
> Fylde College, Lancaster University
> Lancaster, LA1 4YF, England
> -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
> r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
> Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
> (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
> _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed 16 Oct 2002 - 11:56:56 EST