(no subject)

From: Francisco J Molina (fjmolina@lbl.gov)
Date: Fri 11 Oct 2002 - 19:09:01 EST

• Next message: ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk: "Re: [R] read.table( ... comment.char="#") truncated my data"
• Previous message: Stuart Luppescu: "[R] Any MD5 digests for source files?"
• Next in thread: Timothy H. Keitt: "[R] Re: no subject (cpu usage)"
• Reply: Timothy H. Keitt: "[R] Re: no subject (cpu usage)"
• Reply: Roger Peng: "[R] CPU activity"

Message-id: <15782.38189.42371.814988@0-e0-98-8a-c5-4a.dhcp.lbl.gov>

Subject: activity of CPU used by R
X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Reply-To: fjmolina@lbl.gov
FCC: ~/mail/sent

My R processes never use more than 50% of my CPU activity. Is there any way I can make
them use more of it?
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._

• Next message: ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk: "Re: [R] read.table( ... comment.char="#") truncated my data"
• Previous message: Stuart Luppescu: "[R] Any MD5 digests for source files?"
• Next in thread: Timothy H. Keitt: "[R] Re: no subject (cpu usage)"
• Reply: Timothy H. Keitt: "[R] Re: no subject (cpu usage)"
• Reply: Roger Peng: "[R] CPU activity"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue 01 Jun 2004 - 09:31:24 EST