From: Prof Brian Ripley (ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk)
Date: Sat 28 Jun 2003 - 05:22:07 EST
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306272020110.22737-100000@gannet.stats>
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Yao, Minghua wrote:
> Thank you, Prof. Ripley. By adding na.action=na.exclude to loess function,
> the program runs great.
>
> I did omit some trivial things. But I still think it was NA's that caused
> troubles in predict or loess.
*NO* the errors message is from your usage of the result of
predict(loess(Y~X)).
Do make sure that you learn from your mistake, and you do need to
understand why there is a difference here to do so.
-- Brian D. Ripley, ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue 01 Jul 2003 - 09:12:09 EST