Re: R-beta: R-0.61.3 and __setfpucw.

Douglas Bates (bates@stat.wisc.edu)
12 May 1998 07:58:49 -0500


To: Goran Brostrom <gb@stat.umu.se>
Subject: Re: R-beta: R-0.61.3 and __setfpucw.
From: Douglas Bates <bates@stat.wisc.edu>
Date: 12 May 1998 07:58:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: Goran Brostrom's message of Tue, 12 May 1998 12:34:19 +0200 (MET DST)

Goran Brostrom <gb@stat.umu.se> writes:


> Is __sparc__ automatically defined? In sparc/fpu_control.h there
> is a line
> 
> extern void __setfpucw __P ((unsigned short));
> 
> but __setfpucw doesn't seem to be defined somewhere. I don't 
> understand the significance of all this, but maybe it doesn't
> matter?

Did you use something like an NFS mount of a file system to share the
same sources between the two machines?  If you did the configuration
on the Linux machine and kept around a config.cache file, it may have
used some information from the Linux machine in configuring the
compilation for the SPARC.  I would advise trying the
configure/compile sequence again on the SPARC but using a clean set of
source files direct from the .tar.gz archive.
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._