Significance stars (was Re: R-beta: glm bug)

Jim Robison-Cox (jimrc@mathfs.math.montana.edu)
Thu, 18 Jun 1998 10:21:43 -0600 (MDT)


Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 10:21:43 -0600 (MDT)
From: Jim Robison-Cox <jimrc@mathfs.math.montana.edu>
To: r-help <r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch>
Subject: Significance stars (was  Re: R-beta: glm bug)
In-Reply-To: <9806181220.AA19064@alpha.luc.ac.be>

On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Jim Lindsey wrote:
(snip)
> I might also say that I strongly object to the stars and significance
> levels in summary (sorry, Martin, we already discussed this). I
> consider fixed level testing to be bad statistics; at worst, a P-value
> should be given if nothing better (confidence or credibility
> intervals) is available. I do not want my students seeing such stars
> and fixed levels. Make it an option if you like but not the default
> display with summary().
>   Jim

  I agree!  Is there a good way to set an option which goes to a print 
method (in this case print.summary.lm)?  Would it have to be a global 
option? 


Jim Robison-Cox                 ____________            
Department of Math Sciences    |            |           phone: (406)994-5340
2-214 Wilson Hall               \   BZN, MT |           FAX:   (406)994-1789
Montana State University         |  *_______|
Bozeman, MT 59717                 \_|         e-mail: jimrc@math.montana.edu 


-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._