To: Thomas Lumley <thomas@biostat.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: [R] S v. 5
From: Peter Dalgaard BSA <p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk>
Date: 30 Jun 1999 12:41:51 +0200
In-Reply-To: Thomas Lumley's message of "Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:43:04 -0700 (PDT)"
Thomas Lumley <thomas@biostat.washington.edu> writes:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, John Thaden wrote:
>
> > Does R, or will R, be integrating the changes to the Chambers/Lucent S
> > language under their version 5.0? If not already, then when?
>
> Perhaps, but Probably not. (Neither the Chambers et al changes to their
> version 4 or the Mathsoft changes to _their_ version 5).
Yes. I'm fairly sure we won't start messing with the language syntax.
We might lift off some of the features, like connections, etc.
However, the point of developing R should not be just to clone
existing systems. Although we try to be compatible with S, we are more
interested in using it as the foundation for new and interesting
features.
-- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907 -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._