Re: R-alpha: R 0.12 alpha: problem with qt()

Peter Dalgaard BSA (pd@kubism.ku.dk)
06 Nov 1996 17:32:51 +0100


To: Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at
Subject: Re: R-alpha: R 0.12 alpha: problem with qt()
From: Peter Dalgaard BSA <pd@kubism.ku.dk>
Date: 06 Nov 1996 17:32:51 +0100
In-Reply-To: Kurt Hornik's message of Wed, 6 Nov 1996 15:55:47 +0100
Message-Id: <x2wwvzdw0c.fsf@bush.kubism.ku.dk>

Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes:

> The problem seems to appear whenever an optimization flag (e.g., -O) is
> added to CFLAGS in src/Systems/Linux-elf.  I don't understand why, but
> that's what the experiments seem to indicate.  Perhaps I can debug the
> problem using -g -O.

Yup. Now I see it too. I'll take a closer look. qbeta(.99,1,10) does
the same stuff. gcc-2.7.2, by the way. Anyone using anything else?

Re. packages, I agree that it's a bit premature. Not so much that
we're not out of alpha yet, but as long as we still find bugs like the
t.test confidence interval booboo, we probably shouldn't encourage
too many of the clueless to use it for real data analysis. 

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
r-testers mailing list -- To (un)subscribe, send
subscribe	or	unsubscribe
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-testers-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-