Re: R-alpha: R directory standard

Kurt Hornik (Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at)
Wed, 26 Mar 1997 16:26:42 +0100


Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 16:26:42 +0100
Message-Id: <199703261526.QAA08118@aragorn.ci.tuwien.ac.at>
From: Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at>
To: Mike Meyer <mikem@stat.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: R-alpha: R directory standard 
In-Reply-To: <199703261400.JAA02929@desire.stat.cmu.edu>
 <199703261400.JAA02929@desire.stat.cmu.edu>

>>>>> Mike Meyer writes:

> Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at said:
>> O.k., here is something to get us started.

>> * I think the logical layout is to have

>> /usr/local/bin/R		# shell script 	/usr/local/lib/R		# `everything' 	/
>> usr/local/man/man1/R.1		# man page

>> where in the long run `/usr/local' should be read as `installation 
>> prefix'. 

> I think /usr/local has to be called the installation prefix even in
> the short run.  Some people (like me) do not have permissions to write
> to /usr/local.  In our environment /usr/local is a shared campus
> resource, not our local playpen.  For many years we had a lot of
> trouble modifying software to install it in our area, called
> /usr/statlocal.  In recent years, almost all those problems have gone
> away as most software has allowed an installation prefix.  --Mike

Oops ... O.k.  What we should definitely provide for all platforms is a
`plain' .tar.gz file with filenames relative to the installation dir.

-k
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
r-testers mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-testers-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-