[Rd] Re: [R] adding option in the Windows installer for --internet2

From: Duncan Murdoch <dmurdoch_at_pair.com>
Date: Fri 16 Jul 2004 - 11:50:25 EST

(Moved from r-help)

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 19:41:54 -0400, "Liaw, Andy" <andy_liaw@merck.com> wrote:

>The XEmacs and cygwin netinstaller has three install options: "Use IE5
>settings", "Direct connection" (or something like that) and "Install from
>local disk". Option #2 never work for me, but #1 does.

Yes, I've seen that, but I never knew what it meant, and so it didn't give me confidence in the installation. (Did I make the right choice? How would I know if I didn't?)

>I suspect the R
>installer can do something similar: offer the two options (with and
>without), and somehow test if the connection (to CRAN) works. If not,
>prompt the user to try the other option.

We don't have a netinstaller, so a connection to CRAN is not necessary. I would guess that a large number of people installing R don't have a net connection at the time, because a lot of students get it on a CD.

> My take is that this option should
>be (semi?) permanent: If it's needed, it's needed all the time for that

It seems to me that if internet2 works at all, it should always be used, whether necessary or not. (It might be that your machine is behind a firewall sometimes, but not always: but if you've got the required library installed, you probably won't lose it.)

Maybe internet2 should be the default now. I'd guess nowadays most Windows systems would support it.

Does anyone know if there are any disadvantages to using the WinINet functions via internet2.dll instead of the WinSock functions via internet.dll?

Duncan Murdoch

R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Fri Jul 16 11:54:48 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed 03 Nov 2004 - 22:45:02 EST