Re: [Rd] Replying to bug reports

From: Uwe Ligges <ligges_at_statistik.uni-dortmund.de>
Date: Sat 17 Jul 2004 - 20:37:23 EST

Martin Maechler wrote:

>>>>>>"Roger" == Roger D Peng <rpeng@jhsph.edu>
>>>>>>    on Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:13:17 -0400 writes:

>
>
> Roger> I have a naive question here, but only because I've
> Roger> managed to screw this up twice in the last week.
>
> Roger> What is the correct way to reply to a bug report?
>
> Roger> Should r-bugs be in the To: or Cc: fields? I
> Roger> originally thought that hitting "Reply" and stripping
> Roger> of the r-devel email address was sufficient but
> Roger> apparently not.
>
> and be careful to keep the string '(PR#....)' as part of the
> subject *) That should really suffice.
>
> Can you remind me of an example where it didn't?
>
> Martin
>
> *)
> Brian found it useful to move that string to the
> beginning of the subject line in those cases where that line
> has been relatively long -- since other people's mailers may
> break the line in two - which for the 'R-bugs' mail handler
> makes the 2nd part to be "not Subject" and leads to creation of
> another PR#.

Indeed, see yesterdays the duplicated reports #7100 and #7102. Where it would have been essential (at least for Roger's mail client) to move the PR#7100 in front of the subject line.

I don't know JitterBug. Is it possible to put the PR# in front of the subject line rather than appending it at the end in order to overcome this quite frequent problem with rather long subject lines?

Uwe

> ______________________________________________
> R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Sat Jul 17 20:41:09 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed 03 Nov 2004 - 22:45:02 EST