[Rd] Re: [R] R on gentoo amd64 (gcc 3.3.3) is unstable --- no!

From: Prof Brian Ripley <ripley_at_stats.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Sun 22 Aug 2004 - 00:27:44 EST

On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 ivo_welch-rstat8783@mailblocks.com wrote:

> peter/brian: thank you for the help. i can now report that gentoo
> amd64 can compile R just fine, too; it requires the f77 USE flag and a
> gcc compiler rebuild first, though. I also went to gcc 3.4.1. my
> segfault troubles earlier were caused by my use of f2c.
> suggestion: would it be possible to add a code snippet that tests
> whether the user is trying to compile with f2c---and if so, bombs the
> installation? (if "f77 --version == f2c" then die) I know the
> problems are not R's fault, but it can percolate into R and it can
> protect people like myself.

The thing is, it does work on some platforms -- I do test i686 RH8.0 (updated with gcc 3.4.1) from time to time and it looks like I tested 1.9.0 during beta test. So `make check' is the only reliable test. (I've just run the current R-devel to cross-check. It runs into the infinite-loop in LAPACK problem with gcc >= 3.4.0 though, with the same fix.)

I suspect f2c on a 64-bit platform is a bad idea as int != long. We could detect that.

Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595

R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
Received on Sun Aug 22 00:30:33 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri 18 Mar 2005 - 08:59:21 EST