[Rd] Re: [R] R on gentoo amd64 (gcc 3.3.3) is unstable --- no!

From: ivo welch <ivo_welch_at_mailblocks.com>
Date: Tue 07 Sep 2004 - 07:44:22 EST

Prof Brian Ripley wrote:

>On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 ivo_welch-rstat8783@mailblocks.com wrote:
>>peter/brian: thank you for the help. i can now report that gentoo
>>amd64 can compile R just fine, too; it requires the f77 USE flag and a
>>gcc compiler rebuild first, though. I also went to gcc 3.4.1. my
>>segfault troubles earlier were caused by my use of f2c.
>>suggestion: would it be possible to add a code snippet that tests
>>whether the user is trying to compile with f2c---and if so, bombs the
>>installation? (if "f77 --version == f2c" then die) I know the
>>problems are not R's fault, but it can percolate into R and it can
>>protect people like myself.
>The thing is, it does work on some platforms -- I do test i686 RH8.0
>(updated with gcc 3.4.1) from time to time and it looks like I tested
>1.9.0 during beta test. So `make check' is the only reliable test.
>(I've just run the current R-devel to cross-check. It runs into the
>infinite-loop in LAPACK problem with gcc >= 3.4.0 though, with the same
>I suspect f2c on a 64-bit platform is a bad idea as int != long.
>We could detect that.
gentlemen: the folks on the gentoo mailing list did some further investigation into this f2c incompatibility with blas (boy, they are good!). apparently, this is likely to be a gcc bug:

    http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61042 they also have a fix for the particular show-stopper, which occurs in function blas.c. (a "const" addition to the parameters cures the problem.)

just in case you are still interested...



R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Tue Sep 07 07:47:59 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed 03 Nov 2004 - 22:45:13 EST