[Rd] Covergence FLAG in glm (PR#7235)

From: <daniel.jeske_at_ucr.edu>
Date: Sat 18 Sep 2004 - 12:10:40 EST

Full_Name: Daniel R Jeske
Version: 1.8.1
OS: Windows 2000
Submission from: (NULL) (

We have just noticed that when you use glm() it seems the logical output 'converged' is always TRUE. The same data set that shows FALSE in version 1.7.1 shows TRUE in 1.8.1. And I know that FALSE is the correct answer...so it seems like we cannot trust the 'converged' flag for glm() in version 1.8.1 ?????

R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Sat Sep 18 12:15:24 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri 18 Mar 2005 - 09:00:21 EST