Re: [Rd] Covergence FLAG in glm (PR#7235)

From: Uwe Ligges <ligges_at_statistik.uni-dortmund.de>
Date: Sun 19 Sep 2004 - 00:53:38 EST

daniel.jeske@ucr.edu wrote:

> Full_Name: Daniel R Jeske
> Version: 1.8.1
> OS: Windows 2000
> Submission from: (NULL) (138.23.228.79)
>
>
> We have just noticed that when you use glm() it seems the logical
> output 'converged' is always TRUE. The same data set that shows
> FALSE in version 1.7.1 shows TRUE in 1.8.1. And I know that FALSE
> is the correct answer...so it seems like we cannot trust the 'converged'
> flag for glm() in version 1.8.1 ?????

Please try again with a recent alpha version of R-2.0.0 (R-1.8.1 is quite outdated).
If it still happens, please specify a reproducible example and explain why converged=FALSE is expected.

Uwe Ligges

> ______________________________________________
> R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Sun Sep 19 00:57:42 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed 03 Nov 2004 - 22:45:16 EST