Re: [Rd] se.fit from predict.lm (fwd)

From: Hiroyuki Kawakatsu <hkawakat_at_qub.ac.uk>
Date: Fri 15 Oct 2004 - 22:33:32 EST


On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:

> It is intended. It has been that way in S for many years, and lots of
> code relies on it. Why would it be useful to have the standard error of a
> prediction interval called se.fit?
> ^^^

because the "fit" could be for expected or actual y. the return value is named "fit" whether interval="conf" or interval="pred" so i assumed se.fit is the standard error of the returned fit.

> But `innovation' is not standard terminology, and it is not the
> coefficients that uncertain, but their estimates.

true. some (accurate) description of the difference between the interval options would be useful to people like me who are not familiar with the terminology.

h.



Hiroyuki Kawakatsu
School of Management and Economics
25 University Square
Queen's University, Belfast
Belfast BT7 1NN
Northern Ireland
United Kingdom
Tel +44 (0)28 9097 3290
Fax +44 (0)28 9033 5156

R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Fri Oct 15 22:52:00 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed 03 Nov 2004 - 22:45:22 EST