Re: [Rd] str() resets class for environments

From: Peter Dalgaard <>
Date: Fri 26 Nov 2004 - 08:12:39 EST

Gabor Grothendieck <> writes:

> : I am curious though, do you not run into problems by setting and getting
> : attributes on environment in 'mvbutils'? The example of John Chambers I
> : re-posted, which shows that attributes can (will?) get "killed by operating
> : on the [environment] object "locally" in a function", suggests that you
> : will.
> :
> The Chambers example simply shows what can happen now -- not what should
> happen. The real question is what should happen. If all objects
> can have classes and attributes and if environments are objects then
> it follows that environments should be able to have classes and
> attributes too. If the language is to be made irregular in this
> respect then there needs to be a very good reason and none has
> been put forth, at least in this thread.

Environments are already irregular in that they are never duplicated (which is what causes these issues in the first place). External pointers have the same feature, and Luke Tierney has suggested that they perhaps should be wrapped in an object with more normal semantics. Perhaps we should consider doing likewise with environments?

   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (             FAX: (+45) 35327907

______________________________________________ mailing list
Received on Fri Nov 26 08:22:53 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri 18 Mar 2005 - 09:01:43 EST