[Rd] Re: Packages and Libraries (was: Re: lme4 "package" etc ..)

From: Martin Maechler <maechler_at_stat.math.ethz.ch>
Date: Wed 09 Feb 2005 - 01:09:42 EST

>>>>> "tony" == A J Rossini <blindglobe@gmail.com> >>>>> on Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:33:23 +0100 writes:

    tony> For OBVIOUS reasons, is there any chance that we could introduce     tony> "package()" and deprecate "library()"?

This idea is not new {as you must surely have guessed}. In fact, there's a much longer standing proposition of "usePackage()" (IIRC, or "use.package()" ?). However, we (R-core) always had wanted to also provide a ``proper'' class named "package" along with this, but for several reasons didn't get around to it.. yet.

    tony> (well, I'll also ask if we could deprecate "=" for assignment, but     tony> that's hopeless).
:-)

    tony> On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:49:39 +0100, Martin Maechler
    tony> <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:

>> >>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Khomski <pkhomski@wiwi.uni-bielefeld.de>
>> >>>>> on Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:20:03 +0100 writes:
>>
    Pavel> this is a question, how can i specify the random part
    Pavel> in the GLMM-call (of the lme4 library) for compound
    Pavel> matrices just in the the same way as they defined in
    Pavel> the lme-Call (of the nlme library).

>>

>> ``twice in such a short paragraph -- yikes !!'' ... I'm getting
>> convulsive...
>>
>> There is NO lme4 library nor an nlme one !
>> There's the lme4 *PACKAGE* and the nlme *PACKAGE* -- please --
>>
>> ....................


R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Wed Feb 09 01:08:07 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri 18 Mar 2005 - 09:02:45 EST