Re: [Rd] Re: Packages and Libraries (was: Re: lme4 "package" etc ..)

From: Prof Brian Ripley <ripley_at_stats.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Wed 09 Feb 2005 - 05:10:54 EST

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, A.J. Rossini wrote:

> But I don't see a problem with "package("package")", though I'm sure
> I'm missing something.

Grammar. It's like `R CMD build' which some people think installs: here you don't want `to package' you want `to use', and these are read as imperatives.

I think we are all agreed that some variant on usePackage() would be good, but here the perfect is the enemy of the good and the good the enemy of the adequate.

Let's see if someone cares enough to push a design through for 2.1.0.

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595

______________________________________________
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Received on Wed Feb 09 05:06:47 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed 09 Feb 2005 - 05:26:30 EST