Re: [Rd] unexpected behaviour of expression(sum())

From: Marc Schwartz <>
Date: Fri 11 Mar 2005 - 19:13:51 GMT

On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:17 +0000, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> I see you have both a scalable font (the first) and size-specfic fonts.
> My guess is that the scalable font is not encoded in the same way as the
> others: can you track down where it is coming from?
> Otherwise my list on FC3 is the same as yours (minus the duplicates, which
> are also puzzling). I have also just checked Exceed, which has the same
> list plus scalable fonts (and also has
> -adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-adobe-fontspecific
> -adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-sun-fontspecific
> -adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-100-100-p-0-adobe-fontspecific
> -adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-100-100-p-0-sun-fontspecific
> -adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-75-75-p-0-adobe-fontspecific
> -adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-75-75-p-0-sun-fontspecific
> which caused problems for 2.0.1 with getting bold symbols in some sizes,
> hence the second bug fix I mentioned).
> As a wild guess, do you have a font server as well as local fonts?
> Brian

FWIW, here is my list:

$ xlsfonts | grep adobe-symbol


Deepayan, which X server is being used? FC3 (fully updated) is using xorg 6.8.1 if that might make a difference.

Marc mailing list Received on Mon Mar 14 10:34:04 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 20 Feb 2006 - 03:21:01 GMT