Re: [Rd] NaN and linear algebra

From: Bill Northcott <>
Date: Wed 23 Mar 2005 - 13:06:33 GMT

On 23/03/2005, at 7:04 PM, Martin Maechler wrote:
> I pretty much entirely agree with your points, Bill, and would
> tend to declare that this Apple library is ``broken''
> for building a correctly running R.
Thanks for that.

> Let me ask one question I've been wondering about now for a
> while:
> Did you run "make check" after building R,
> and "make check" ran to completion without an error?

The thought occurred to me as well. So I tried to run it, but I could not get it to run. It was a couple of months ago I built this version of R, and maybe I trashed something. Time ran out, and I had to go and earn a living.

I will try again, and report the results.
> If yes (which I doubt quite a bit), there *is* a bug in R's
> quality control / quality assurance tools -- and I would want to
> add a check for the misbehavior you've mentioned.

I would also be surprised if it runs without error.

I don't really understand LAPACK enough. I started reading and trying to work out how to produce test cases which I could submit to Apple as a bug or bugs.

Bill mailing list Received on Thu Mar 24 00:09:37 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 24 Oct 2005 - 22:26:31 GMT