Re: [Rd] Alpha and Beta testing of R versions

From: Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek_at_r-project.org>
Date: Fri 04 Nov 2005 - 13:51:18 GMT

On Nov 4, 2005, at 6:58 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:

> Martin's point is generally very valid, but in the case of the
> 2.2.0 release remarkably few of the bugs found since release were
> new in 2.2.0.
> One thing we have learnt is that none of the testers seem to look
> at HTML help (which accounts for 2 of the 4 2.2.0-only bugs I
> counted).
>
> What we need most is persistent help in testing each release,
> especially on unusual platforms. How do we `incentivize' that?

I suspect that in the particular case of OS X the problem was probably visibility - it was the first time ever that nightly OS X binaries were available during alpha/beta phase (afaict), but I'm not sure how many people knew about it. I think posted about it on R-SIG- Mac during some discussion, but maybe I should have announced it more specifically somewhere. I'm, not even sure whether there was a link from the main page on CRAN. I would think that OS X users are more likely to rely on binaries, so the above is more relevant than on other platforms.

>> - being listed as helpful person in R's 'THANKS' file
>> {but that may not entice those who are already listed},
>> or even in the NEWS of the new relase
>> or on the "Hall of fame of R beta testers"

The latter sounds good to me, although I'm not sure how many of our users are striving for fame ;).

Cheers,
Simon



R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Sat Nov 05 01:26:59 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri 04 Nov 2005 - 16:21:16 GMT