[Rd] Enlightenment sought and a possible buglet in vector.Rd

From: Berwin A Turlach <berwin_at_maths.uwa.edu.au>
Date: Fri 02 Dec 2005 - 10:31:13 GMT

Dear all,

First, I recently had reasons to read the help page of as.vector() and noticed in the example section the following example:

     x <- c(a = 1, b = 2)
     all.equal(x, as.vector(x)) ## FALSE

However, in all versions of R in which I executed this example, the all.equal command returned TRUE which suggest that either the comment in the help file is wrong or the all.equal/as.vector combination does not work as intended in this case. For the former case, I attach below a patch which would fix vector.Rd.

Secondly, I stumbled across two behaviours of R that I cannot explain but would like to know why R behaves as it does. But since I expect the explanations to be quite technical, I though that r-devel is the more appropriate list to ask on than r-help.

The first example is the following:

       > f1
           par.def <- par(no.readonly=TRUE)
           tt <- sys.on.exit()
       > f1()
        language par(par.def)
       > f2
           par.def <- par(no.readonly=TRUE)
           print(tt <- sys.on.exit())
       > f2()

I found in the R language definition manual the passage that discourages users of assigning objects within function calls since it is not guaranteed that the assignment is ever made because of R's lazy evaluation model. But this does not seem to explain the above behaviour since the argument to print is evaluated. If I replace sys.on.exit() with, say, ls() in both functions, then they produce the same output (and the output that I expect). Why does f2() not work with sys.on.exit()?

The second behaviour that I cannot explain was produced by code written by somebody else, namely:

> foo

          z <- x/4
          while( abs(z*z*z-x) > 1e-10 ){
             z <- (2*z+x/z^2)/3

The documentation of function() says that if "the end of a function is reached without calling 'return', the value of the last evaluated expression is returned." And this seems to happen in this case:

> z <- foo(3)
> z

      [1] 1.442250

However, my understanding was always that the return value of a function issued on the command line will be printed; except, of course, if invisible() is used to return the value. This is not the case for the above function:

> foo(3)

produces no output. And this had us stunned for some time. On the other hand:

> ( foo(3) )

      [1] 1.442250

So my question is why does R, when "foo(3)" is issued on the command line, not print the value returned by the function?

Any enlightening comments are highly appreciated.



Index: src/library/base/man/vector.Rd

 ###-- All the following are TRUE:

R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Received on Fri Dec 02 21:35:47 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 20 Feb 2006 - 03:21:34 GMT