From: Seth Falcon <>
Date: Fri 21 Jul 2006 - 01:21:55 GMT (Allen S. Rout) writes:

> Prof Brian Ripley <> writes:
>> And that is the reason: everyone who downloads pays the price for unneeded
>> fields in that file. It was a deliberate decision to minimize download
>> times, which are already substantial for people on a dialup connection.
> OK, that meets the definition of "not well recieved" ;)

For the Bioconductor project, we also wanted more information to be programatically available regarding the packages in a repository. Instead of bloating the PACKAGES file, we put a separate file, VIEWS in our repository. Here is an example:

This file is used to generate the HTML pages that describe our packages (happy to share the code for generating the VIEWS file if you like).

So, if you were able to host a CRAN mirror, you could annotate it similarly.

+ seth mailing list Received on Fri Jul 21 11:24:57 2006

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Mon 24 Jul 2006 - 18:32:18 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.